Pregnancy Outcome After Transferring Genetically Tested Embryos vs. Non-Tested Embryos

Tea Charkviani

Abstract


Abstract

 

Background:  Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has revolutionized fertility treatments, offering many couples a chance at pregnancy who might otherwise have difficulty conceiving. One of the critical factors for ART success is the selection of viable embryos for transfer. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has emerged as a widely used method to enhance embryo selection, improve pregnancy outcomes, and reduce the risk of miscarriage. (2). By identifying chromosomally normal (euploid) embryos, PGT-A aims to increase implantation rates and overall IVF efficiency (3).

Aim:  This article aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of pregnancy outcomes between genetically tested (PGT-A) and non-tested embryos. Specifically, it examines implantation rates, miscarriage rates, live birth rates, and time to pregnancy, we seek to determine the clinical value of PGT-A and its role in optimizing ART outcomes

DesignRetrospective,  comparative study

 

Materials and methods: A total of 225 patients were included in this study, all of whom were under the age of 35. The study population included recipients, advanced maternal age patients, as well as patients with a history of recurrent miscarriages.

All donors and young patients  underwent ovarian stimulation with GnRH-antagonist protocol, The ovulation trigger was administered when 20% of follicles reached 18 mm. Aspiration was performed 35 hours after the ovulation trigger was administered followed  embryo transfer as part of their IVF treatment. The resulting blastocysts underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) using next-generation sequencing(NGS). Pregnancy outcomes were assessed by biochemical indicators, miscarriages, and live births.

The patients were divided into two groups - PGT-A Group (First Group): 110 patients who underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Non-PGT-A Group (Second Group): 115 patients who did not undergo genetic testing of embryos.

Results: A total of 116 embryos were transferred in the PGT-A group, single embryos were transferred to 104 patient and six patients requesting the transfer of two blastocysts. In this group, 59 pregnancies were achieved (53.6%). Among them, 4 pregnancies resulted in miscarriage at 6–7 weeks of gestation (6.8%), and 2 were biochemical pregnancies (3.4%), where pregnancy was detected only by hCG levels in the blood. Ultimately, 53 pregnancies continued to delivery (89.8% of pregnancies, 48.2% of all transfers), with live births occurring between 38 and 40 weeks of gestation.

In the non-PGT-A group, 220 embryos were transferred, with an average of 1.91 embryos per patient, leading to 41 pregnancies (35.7%). In this group, 7 pregnancies miscarried at 6 weeks (17.1%), 2 patients experienced late miscarriage at 14–16 weeks (4.9%), and one fetus out of them  (2.4%) was diagnosed with a chromosomal abnormality. The remaining 32 patients delivered healthy babies at 37–40 weeks of gestation (78% of pregnancies, 27.8% of all transfers).

Conclusion: PGT-A offers a significant advantage by selecting euploid embryos in improving pregnancy outcomes and reducing miscarriage rates(3). However, its routine use should be tailored to patient-specific factors. Further large-scale studies are needed to optimize patient selection criteria for PGT-A, ensuring its application is both cost-effective and beneficial for intended parents(4).


Keywords


Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), next-generation sequencing (NGS), in vitro fertilization (IVF), implantation rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate, chromosomal abnormalities, assisted reproductive technology (ART).

Full Text:

PDF

References


Reference:

Yan J, Qin Y, Zhao H, Sun Y, Gong F, Li R, et al. Live Birth with or without Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;385(22).

Hu M, Liu M, Tian S, Guo L, Zang Z, Chen ZJ, et al. Comparative analysis of pregnancy outcomes in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and conventional in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a stratified examination on the basis of the quantity of oocytes and blastocysts from a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2024;122(1).

Aharon D, Gounko D, Lee JA, Mukherjee T, Copperman AB, Sekhon L. PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING FOR ANEUPLOIDY IN DONOR OOCYTE IVF CYCLES: A MATCHED, SIBLING OOCYTE COHORT STUDY. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(3).

Liang Z, Wen Q, Li J, Zeng D, Huang P. A systematic review and meta-analysis: clinical outcomes of recurrent pregnancy failure resulting from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Vol. 14, Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2023.

Cimadomo D, Fabozzi G, Vaiarelli A, Ubaldi N, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. Impact of maternal age on oocyte and embryo competence. Vol. 9, Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2018.

Frick AP. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Vol. 70, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2021.

Charkviani T, Chkonia L, Kurashvili N, Kutchukhidze N, Zhorzholadze T, McCulloh D. Administration of the first 2 doses of gonadotropin at twice the dose during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation decreases total gonadotropin administration during in vitro fertilisation(IVF) cycle. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3).

H. McCulloh D, M. Colon J, G. McGovern P. Modeling Follicle Stimulating Hormone Levels in Serum for Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation III: Improved Gonadotropin Administration. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13(3).

McCulloh DH, Kutchukhidze N, Charkviani T, Zhorzholadze T, Barbakadze T, Munné S, et al. Follicle size indicates oocyte maturity and blastocyst formation but not blastocyst euploidy following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation of oocyte donors. Human Reproduction. 2020;35(3).

Morales C. Current Applications and Controversies in Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies (PGT-A) in In Vitro Fertilization. Vol. 31, Reproductive Sciences. 2024.

Fauser BCJM, Diedrich K, Bouchard P, Matzuk FD, Franks S, Hamamah S, et al. Contemporary genetic technologies and female reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(6).

Sanders KD, Silvestri G, Gordon T, Griffin DK. Analysis of IVF live birth outcomes with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority data collection 2016–2018. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(12).

Simon JP, Pradervand PA, Cina V, Superti-Furga A, Primi MP, Leyvraz-Recrosio C, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing: Legal and ethical aspects in clinical practice. Rev Med Suisse. 2019;15(668).

Penzias A, Bendikson K, Butts S, Coutifaris C, Falcone T, Fossum G, et al. The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3).

Haviland MJ, Murphy LA, Modest AM, Fox MP, Wise LA, Nillni YI, et al. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using a matched propensity score design. Human Reproduction. 2020;35(10).

Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: Towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6).

Scott RT, Ferry K, Su J, Tao X, Scott K, Treff NR. Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: A prospective, blinded, nonselection study. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(4).

Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, García-Velasco JA. Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: A meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(6).

E.M. D, J. B. Preimplantation genetic screening using comprehensive chromosome screening technology improves embryo selection: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Vol. 30, Human Reproduction. 2015.

Facadio Antero M, Singh B, Pradhan A, Gornet M, Kearns WG, Baker V, et al. Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles. F and S Reports. 2021;2(1).

Neal SA, Morin SJ, Franasiak JM, Goodman LR, Juneau CR, Forman EJ, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is cost-effective, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(5).

Ni Y, Shen H, Yao H, Zhang E, Tong C, Qian W, et al. Differences in Fertility-Related Quality of Life and Emotional Status Among Women Undergoing Different IVF Treatment Cycles. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023;16.

Kuhlmann E, Scharli P, Schick M, Ditzen B, Langer L, Strowitzki T, et al. The Posttraumatic Impact of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss in Both Women and Men. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023;83(1).

Lohmann-Bigelow J, Longo SA, Jiang X, Robichaux AG. Does dilation and curettage affect future pregnancy outcomes? Vol. 7, Ochsner Journal. 2007.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 

Become a REVIEWER 

 

ISSN: 2346-8491 (online)